Wouldn't it be hilarious if the prolific downloader that a judge has ordered Verizon to identify for the RIAA turned out to be the company RIAA members hire to saturate and dilute the peer-to-peer networks?

The ludicrous bit is that, by hiring this company, they've tainted all the numbers they have claimed to show how P2P hurts them. I'm not a proponent of people ripping off anyone's art or intellectual property, I just believe that it should be fought fairly. Monkeying with the data is not fair.